•1 min read•from Machine Learning
One thing that's been bothering me lately: benchmark performance often tells me almost nothing about whether a workflow will survive production usage.[D]
I've seen systems score well internally and then immediately fail under:
- ambiguous user intent
- messy real-world context
- contradictory instructions
- long-running sessions
Feels like evaluation still heavily rewards clean-task optimization instead of behavioral robustness.
What are people using beyond standard eval pipelines?
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site