1 min readfrom Machine Learning

ICMI 2026 Reviews [D]

Did anyone else submit to ACM ICMI 2026?
The reviews were recently released, and this is my first time submitting to ICMI, so I'm not very familiar with the acceptance patterns.
I submitted a long paper and received the following overall ratings:
4 (Probably Accept), 3 (Borderline), 4 (Probably Accept)

The reviewer with the highest stated expertise recommended acceptance, while the borderline reviewer had some concerns about soundness but still considered it a nice contribution.
For those who have submitted to or reviewed for ICMI before, how would you interpret these scores? Is a 4/3/4 generally considered competitive after rebuttal, or is it still a long shot?
Would appreciate any insights from past authors or reviewers.

submitted by /u/kanishq95
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#natural language processing for spreadsheets
#generative AI for data analysis
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#financial modeling with spreadsheets
#rows.com
#real-time data collaboration
#real-time collaboration
#ICMI
#ACM
#conference
#reviews
#acceptance patterns
#long paper
#rebuttal
#soundness
#expertise
#contribution
#scores
#competitive
#authors