•1 min read•from Machine Learning
How papers are selected for Best Paper, Oral, or Highlight presentation at major ML/CV conferences such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, NeurIPS, and ICLR? [D]
From what I understand, reviewers usually do not directly vote for these categories or nominate papers themselves. So how does the selection process typically work?
Here are specific questions I wonder
- Who actually selects the candidates: ACs, SACs, program chairs, award committees, or a separate committee?
- Do ACs or committees read the camera-ready version, or is the decision based on the originally submitted/reviewed version?
- Is the selection mostly based on reviewer scores, or do factors like novelty, impact, and discussion among ACs play a bigger role?
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site
Tagged with
#cloud-based spreadsheet applications
#natural language processing for spreadsheets
#generative AI for data analysis
#rows.com
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#ML
#CV
#Conference Selection
#Best Paper
#Oral Presentation
#Highlight Presentation
#CVPR
#ICCV
#ECCV
#NeurIPS
#ICLR
#Reviewer Scores
#Area Chairs (ACs)
#Senior Area Chairs (SACs)
#Program Chairs